Move review closer to the change
Check new features, sensitive code paths and significant updates while the development context is still fresh.
SECURITY FOR EVERYDAY DEVELOPMENT
Make security review part of building software, not a task saved for the next audit. Eonycs brings AI-assisted assessments, code evidence and actionable findings into a workflow your team can repeat with every meaningful change.
SOURCE EVIDENCE
RESPONSE EXAMPLE
GET /search?q=<eonycs-canary>
200 OK · input reflected without escaping
Illustrative example · not a live assessment
Why now
31%
of breaches began with vulnerability exploitation
Verizon 2026 Data Breach Investigations Report ↗This is a share of the breaches studied—not a prediction for your business or the share Eonycs can prevent. It includes vulnerabilities beyond custom application code.
AI is accelerating attackers’ ability to find and use weaknesses. The opportunity is to shorten the gap between shipping a change and reviewing its security—not to wait until an annual assessment.
Read the UK NCSC assessment on AI and cyber threats ↗Check new features, sensitive code paths and significant updates while the development context is still fresh.
Work from code references and explanations. Review the evidence, prioritize the issue and decide what to fix.
Assess, remediate and reassess. A routine your team owns, alongside code review, functional testing and specialist security work.
Prepare white-box source analysis, black-box target testing or a mixed assessment. The selected mode determines the inputs, authorization and execution requirements.
Work with selected source files and saved sources. Focus an assessment on the code you need to review rather than treating every change as an unrelated project.
Review severity, supporting evidence and code references where available. Optional AI explanations help turn technical findings into a practical review conversation.
Return to run history, reports, saved sources and targets. Share the review with the people responsible for remediation.
Check your allowance and assessment settings before execution. Scope and available capacity shape what an assessment can cover.
Use the results to guide changes, then assess the updated source or authorized target. A successful run is not a guarantee that every vulnerability has been found.
Open the app demo to explore assessment history, findings, explanations, targets and settings. It uses recorded DVWA assessment results and masked account details. Actions that would run tests, connect services or change real data are blocked.
One connected workspace
Product illustration · not a live assessment
Make security review a checkpoint in your development process. Start with an important change, learn from the findings and repeat before the next release.
Select the source or target relevant to the feature, update or security-sensitive change you want to assess.
Select the changed source
Choose the assessment type, provide the required inputs and review authorization. Domain ownership verification does not itself grant permission to test.
Define the authorized boundary
Check the assessment settings and available usage before you start. Coverage depends on the inputs, mode and execution limits.
Assess the selected input
Read the findings and supporting evidence. Validate potential issues and apply the fixes that fit your application.
Review evidence and apply a fix
Assess the updated version and keep the review history. Repeat for meaningful changes; combine it with your existing engineering and security controls.
Reassess the updated version
No. Our focus is making security review a routine part of software development. Reports can help document that work, but the main goal is to help teams identify and address weaknesses as software changes.
Build a review cadence around risk: new features, sensitive code paths and significant releases are useful checkpoints. Eonycs supports repeatable assessments; your team decides when and how to run them. This does not imply an automatic check on every commit.
No. Verizon’s 2026 DBIR reports vulnerability exploitation as the starting point for 31% of the breaches studied. That is industry context, not a measured prevention rate for Eonycs. It includes weaknesses outside custom application code.
No. Potential findings need review. Check supporting evidence, scope and confidence before treating an issue as exploitable. AI explanations are review aids, not independent proof.
Yes. Use it alongside code review, dependency checks, specialist penetration tests and operational defenses. No single assessment or tool covers every security risk.
That is the standard we are building towards. Start making it part of your team’s next development cycle.
Talk to our team